Believe it or not I too love women-just not American women. Now that may sound unfair, unreasonable, or whatever. But that is the way it is.

Now you are correct that the problem is the government. But who has their hands on the levers of power? The feminists. Who benefits? Feminists and often women. Who often supports the feminists? Often the women. Who loses? Always the men. And for the record I don't live in fear of anyone. I'm one guy who is angry, and this one guy bothers some people.

Too

Damn

Bad

I've lived with things that no innocent man should have to. If people have a problem with my tone that is their problem.]]>

I just came across a great quote:

FAMILY
“When it comes to figuring out what’s gone wrong with our culture, we can usually rely on the American Psychological Association (APA) to catch on last. Thus, it came to pass a few days ago that the APA released its findings that American girls are sexualized. And that’s bad. If you missed the headlines, it may be because of stiff competition from the breaking news that Anna Nicole is still dead and Britney is still disturbed... It can’t be coincidence that girls’ self-objectification—looking for male attention in all the wrong ways—has risen as father presence has declined. At last tally, 30 percent of fathers weren’t sleeping in the same house as their biological children. The APA is calling for more education, more research, forums, girls groups and Web zines to tackle girl sexualization. But my instinctual guess is that getting fathers back into their daughters’ lives and back on the job would do more than all the forums and task forces combined. Ultimately, it’s a daddy thing.” —Kathleen Parker]]>

Except that perfect equality is impossible to attain. However when "promoting" equality, the rules are always set up to move in that direction by whatever definition the feminists decide (today) is the meaning of "equality" (without ever getting to the end zone because as I said it is impossible). And who always ends up paying the price for "promoting" equality? Answer: the men. As ONE example:

Moronic Statement Alert

"Equality of opportunity is easy to attain."

Try saying that to young black men living in ghettos and also see how 'equal' are their 'opportunities' when compared to those living in rich neighbourhoods and who have been educated in the most expensive of schools.

Try saying that to short dumpy women who wish to become ballet dancers.

Try saying that to the boys whose education is being biased in favor of the girls.

We are 40 years into "promoting" equality for women and with many feminists we are not even close. The rules are always changing based on new statistics that are generated to show more disadvantage to women so that more disadvantage can be heaped on men. IT IS NEVER-ENDING. And average women who disagree have been silent for 40 years. There are too many women everywhere benfitting from the status quo to call for a change-UNLESS they pay a bigger price in some other way, e.g., not being able to find a man stupid enough to marry them. Making generalizations about women bothers some people. Even when it is true. Good! It is enraging to be unfairly treated isn't it? There is a lesson to be learned there.

My point is that the search for 'equality' is never-ending, and that in the process of searching for this impossible goal, the stirring up of male hatred is a major consequence - and, indeed, in the case of feminists, it is a purposeful aim.

And seasoned men's activists will know that whatever statistical differences are found between men and women, the feminists will always manage to stir up hatred towards men on the basis of them.

As ONE example, Affirmative Action will never end until America has an equal number of accountants, engineers, doctors, bricklayers, and an equal distribution of managers, CFOs, CEOs, directors,...etc. between men and women. Until that point, the rules of "promoting equality" will benefit women and hurt men.

Now I ask the clear thinking people here: If you are a member of the group that most benefits by the rules "promoting equality" and you are in a position to "reform" a system that the other group is objecting about-well just how far will the privileged group go to look out for the equality of the side that has always been on the losing team? My guess is that they will always look for ways where they keep their advantages.]]>

People in these nations, who love freedom, obviously know that every child has a natural right to be raised by both of their own parents. Both Moms and Dads; Grandparents, Aunts and Uncles, will soon mature enough to recognize this self-evident truth.

Teri, this is great news. It’s a really good day.

Richard Eichinger
Eaton, OH]]>

I would agree too, Teri, with any side promoting equality. But time and the test has proven over and over that liars try to wriggle out of consequences and have no resistance to telling further lies to cover their tracks. Promoting has to be tied to sincerity and honesty. We belived the feminists before when they said they wanted equality. This move by Spanish feminists is straight out of a 'Desperate Housewives' script. Let them prove otherwise before rushing to embrace them.]]>

I decide each issue independently. I can agree with either side if they're promoting equality. I'm an egalitarian. I liberally support gays and lesbians and I conservatively support fathers and family.

America's feminists should be ashamed. They knowingly promote lies degrading men and harming children. They should take note of the intelligence and initiative taken by the untarnished feminists in Spain.]]>

What a total bunch of liars feminist are and here we have the "liberal" "oh I am so much for men's rights" female promoting her misandry here.

You have lost the plot whenever anyone promotes those lying arsewipes.

You've lost it.

Go away..]]>

The ad says 'co-parenting rescues women from their traditional role of child-raising'. Why does this leave a bad taste in the mouth? The 'best interests of the children' seems to be missing. In fact the children are a burden to be 'rescued' from. Mothers used want to raise children and wanting to be 'rescued' from it has entirely the wrong approach. Any change here?

Are these feminists going to rescue men from their traditional role of working to support the family, even when that family has been ripped from them by female whim and antagonistic, unjust courts? ? I guess that would be going too far. Will they claim that only some men are rapists and some sexual intercourse isn't really rape after all? Nah.

Many movements, after a disasterous term in power, try to slide out of the consequences of their evil. The Russian Communists tried 'Peristoika', and reaped chaos as the people simply threw them off; the Chinese Communists are trying 'Communism with a human face' but still have overflowing 're-education' camps and victims' families still pay for the executioners' bullets; imagination has to employed to think what the Nazis might have said - 'Jews can help us make the New Reich -Arbeit Mach Frei".

Feminism has proven itself to be mendacious when it wasn't blatently lying. I do not have any reason to think that a group that calls itself Feminist, has anything to offer for the benefit of humanity. Except more lies.]]>

Stating "feminism" and "equal rights" in the same sentence makes it an oxymoron.

Is this not the same country where feminists forced through a law to make men servants to women ?]]>